检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南林业科技大学交通运输工程学院,湖南长沙410004 [2]长沙中南物流工程技术研究所,湖南长沙410004
出 处:《中南林学院学报》2006年第6期81-87,共7页Journal of Central South Forestry University
摘 要:模糊综合评价是决策分析中常用的方法,在不同的情况中应该采用不同的模型进行综合评价.介绍了两种评价模型.它们在出发点、建立方法、评价内容和实现过程上各不相同,各有千秋.相对模糊综合评价建模简单,运算方便,但不能确定方案本身的优劣程度.而多级模糊综合评价能区分影响因素的层次,降低了权重分配的难度,能判断出方案本身的好坏,但建模相对复杂,运算工作量大,隶属度构建复杂.Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) is being commonly used in decision analyses ; different models of FCE ought to be used in different situations. The paper introduces two kinds of models of FCE which have characteristics and advantages in such aspects as standpoints, methods of building models, evaluation contents and realization processes. Although they do not differentiate a scheme superior or inferior in itself, the relative model of FCE has advantages that the model building is easy and data operation is simple while the multi-class model of FCE can distinguish the affecting degrees of evaluation scheme factors, lessen the difficulty of weight distribution and judge a scheme as good or bad in itself. Yet the latter model is complicated in construction, tremendous in calculation and complex in the building of subjection degrees.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69