检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]比利时安特卫普大学政治学系国际政治学教授 [2]不详
出 处:《欧洲研究》2006年第6期47-62,共16页Chinese Journal of European Studies
摘 要:近年来,欧盟越来越寻求在世界贸易组织(WTO)框架下就投资、竞争、环境和劳工等领域达成规制性(regulatory)协定。欧盟为什么选择WTO而非其他国际组织来寻求规制性目标以满足这些新需求呢?本文提出两条原因:第一,国际贸易谈判中议题的关联性已由单一的市场准入权互换向市场准入权与规制互换转变。内部民意的多样性以及决策达成共识的需要,使得欧盟特别依赖于这种广泛的议题关联性。第二,WTO的司法化及实施交叉报复的可能性加强了其承诺的可信度,相应提高了该组织在跨政策领域实行关联议题谈判的吸引力。本文将揭示这两条原因如何促进了欧盟将规制性议题提上多哈发展回合议程的努力。The European Union(EU)has increasingly called for regulatory agreements in the World Trade Organization(WTO)in areas such as investment,competition,environment and labour.Why has the EU attempted to satisfy such new demands by pursuing regulatory goals within the WTO rather than within other international organisations? There are two reasons for the EU's choice of the WTO:first,the nature of issue linkage in international trade negotiations has changed from exclusive exchanges of market access to the exchanges of market access for regulation;and second,judicialisation and the possibility of cross-retaliation in the WTO have enhanced the credibility of WTO commitments,increased its attractiveness for issue linkages across policy fields.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249