单窗算法和单通道算法对参数估计误差的敏感性分析  被引量:12

Sensitivity analysis of mono-window and single-channel algorithms to the possible errors in parameter estimation

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:丁凤[1] 徐涵秋[1] 

机构地区:[1]福州大学环境与资源学院

出  处:《测绘科学》2007年第1期87-90,95,共5页Science of Surveying and Mapping

基  金:国家自然科学基金项目(40371107);国家自然科学基金项目(40371096);福建省自然科学基金计划资助项目(项目编号:2006J0281);福建省教育厅科技项目(JB050303)

摘  要:单窗算法和单通道算法的提出为应用LandsatTM热波段反演地表温度开辟了新途径。由于进行地面像元尺度同步温度测量难度较大,目前尚无法对这两种算法进行直接评判。通过对算法所需参数分别取一定变动区间并进行渐变取值测算,分析了算法对其参数估计误差的敏感性,以此作为对这两种算法适用性的一个间接评判依据。The advent of the mono-window algorithm(MWA)and single-channel method(SCM)has opened up a new way for retrieving land surface temperature(LST)from Landsat TM thermal band.However,due to the great difficulty of obtaining the in situ ground measurements comparable to the pixel size of Landsat TM6 data at the satellite pass,validation of these two algorithms with the in situ measurements is still not feasible at the present time.In this paper,a sensitivity analysis has been conducted to examine the effects of possible errors in the three parameter(i.e.,ground emissivity “ε”,near-surface air temperature “T 0” and the atmospheric water vapor content “w”)estimations on LST retrievals,thus to provide an alternative way to assess the performance of the two algorithms.The research results show that:(1)both MWA and SCM are not very sensible to the possible errors of ε;(2)MWA is more sensible to the possible errors of w(when T 0 is low)or T 0(when w is high),if compared with the relatively insignificant impact of the possible errors of ε on the retrieved LSTs;(3)as for SCM,the effect of the possible errors of w on the LST retrievals is much greater than that of ε.

关 键 词:LANDSAT TM 单窗算法 单通道算法 参数估计误差 敏感性分析 

分 类 号:TP75[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象