融资租赁合同中索赔权的法律分析  

Law Analysis of Claim a Refund in Contracts for Inter Mediation

作　　者：任昊丽[1] 王利敏[1] 

机构地区：[1]河北大学政法学院,河北保定071002

出　　处：《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2006年第4期47-49,共3页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

摘　　要：融资租赁合同被新《合同法》予以明确规定,但在承租人拥有索赔权的问题上其规定并不明确。实践中和理论界都承认承租人拥有索赔权,但其索赔权往往通过协议、委托等方式获得,这使承租人拥有的索赔权非常被动。基于保护承租人利益的考虑,立法上应赋予承租人对出卖人的直接索赔权。There are clear rules about contracts for inter mediation in new contract law. In practice and thesis, people always agree on lessee possessing claim a refund, but lessee often own passive claim a refund through agreement alienation and delegation etc. To protect the interests of the lessee, the law should endow the right to lessee to claim a refund directly towards the seller.

关 键 词：融资租赁 索赔权 学说 

分 类 号：DF418[政治法律—经济法学]