填补公司合同“缝隙”——司法介入公司运作的一个分析框架  

Filling Up the Corporate Contract "Loopholes":an Analytical Framework of Judicial Involvement on Corporate Governance

作　　者：罗培新[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法学院经济法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《北京大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2007年第1期124-134,共11页Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金课题"公司治理法律制度研究"(06CFX013);上海市哲学社会科学课题"证券市场和谐生态环境的法律构建";上海市重点学科"经济法"(T1002)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：新《公司法》在拓宽了任意性规范适用范围的同时,大大拓展了司法介入公司运作的空间,以期将公司自治增强之后可能带来的诸多问题,委诸司法裁判。然而,部分公司法规则属性的模糊不清,以及公司长期合同固有的合意缺陷,使得司法在履行“解读公司法则”和“弥补合同缝隙”职责之时面临诸多困境。司法必须超越法条的字意、而从法条的根本属性来解读公司法规则。应当允许公司参与方在一定条件下放弃公司法规则。与此同时,鉴于中国的特殊情境,还必须避免司法的“合同漏洞补充”异化为变相的行政干预。The recently amended Company Law of China greatly enhances its enabling nature and expands the room of judicial involvement on corporate governance, with the expectation that the Courts would deal with the issues resulting from the enhanced corporate autonomy. However, the blurred or confusing nature of some corporate law provisions and the intrinsic defects of long-term corporate contracts confront the courts much judicial plights. The courts should read the provision in accordance with Company Law＇s fundamental nature, and deliver the corporate participants permission to opt-out the Company Law under some circumstances. At the same time, allowing for the specific context of China, the ＂contracts loopholes filling-up＂ function of judicial involvements should be avoided being catabolized as governmental interferences.

关 键 词：公司长期合同 合同缝隙 公司法规则的属性 司法介入 

分 类 号：D922.28[政治法律—经济法学]