论定作人的指示过失责任  

On the Liability Taken by Processors in Directive Mispalys

作　　者：姬新江[1] 王燕军[2] 

机构地区：[1]广东警官学院法律系,广东广州510230 [2]广州广播电视大学,广东广州510230

出　　处：《当代法学》2007年第1期105-110,共6页Contemporary Law Review

摘　　要：定作人指示过失责任是《人身损害赔偿司法解释》新规定的一种侵权责任形态,其对《民法通则》关于“侵权的民事责任”的规定是一种积极的补充和完善,对我国特殊侵权行为体系的构建和民法典的制定具有重要的创新价值。但定作人指示过失责任是替代责任抑或连带责任,还是替代责任与连带责任兼而有之,以及定作人对其过失承担责任的具体分配,在现行法律和最高法院的司法解释中均未明确,在理论上也颇有争议,本文拟就上述问题进行探究。Processors should take the liability in directive misplays, which is newly issued by Legal Explanations on Compensations for Personal Injuries. Such a creative legal formation is of great importance to the Civil Law and the reconstruction on the statutable offense. However, it＇s not clearly stated by the current laws and the Supreme Court whether processors should take a joint liability , or a vicarious liability , or even both. Thus the paper proposes an argument on these questions.

关 键 词：定作人 指示过失 法律责任 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]