WTO争端解决程序中的证据问题  

The Issue of Evidence in Dispute Resolution Procedure of the WTO

作　　者：朱榄叶[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法学院 国际法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《当代法学》2007年第1期121-127,共7页Contemporary Law Review

摘　　要：WTO争端解决程序中举证责任和证据的可接受性问题具有重要的实践意义。除了各国都普遍接受的“谁主张谁举证”的原则之外,文章还分析了下列情况下的举证责任分配问题:被申诉方援引例外条款时、争端涉及具体协定时、争端双方关于执行报告的期限有争议,以及双方就败诉方的执行是否符合专家组和上诉机构报告的争议。关于证据的可接受性问题,提交证据的主体、证据的种类和提出时间问题是最关键的方面。This article discusses the issue of burden of prove and the acceptability of evidence in WTO dispute settlement proceedings. Besides the generally accepted principle of ＂The one who claims bears the burden of proof＇, this article also analyses the burden of proof under the following situations： the respondent invokes an ＂exception＂ of the WTO provisions, the dispute involves specific agreement, dispute regarding the period of implementation of panel/appellate body reports, and dispute regarding compliance. As for the acceptability of evidence, it is about who can provide evidence, what kind of evidence may be accepted and when to provide.

关 键 词：WTO 争端解决 证据 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]