检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱贞[1] 许文波[1] 李聪勇[2] 张珍英[2] 刘中华[1] 王同展[3] 何维宽[4] 周淑洁[4] 王常银[3]
机构地区:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心病毒病预防控制所 [2]河南省疾病预防控制中心,郑州450003 [3]山东省疾病预防控制中心,济南250014 [4]安徽省疾病预防控制中心,合肥230061
出 处:《中国计划免疫》2006年第6期489-494,共6页Chinese Journal of Vaccines and Immunization
摘 要:目的尝试建立一种新型的、可以推广应用于中国麻疹实验室网络的诊断风疹病毒感染的方法。方法来自山东、河南、安徽省疾病预防控制中心麻疹实验室送检的咽拭子标本38份,同时分别用病毒分离[通过逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)判断]、免疫荧光(IFA)法和比色法免疫学实验进行风疹病毒检测,并将三种方法的敏感性、特异性进行比较和评价。结果三种方法分别检测38份咽拭子标本,阳性均为22份,阳性检出率均为57.9%,检测结果完全一致。结论与RT-PCR和IFA两种方法相比,比色法免疫学实验更快速简便,不需要昂贵的仪器,通过肉眼即可判断结果,而且结果敏感可靠。因此作为检测风疹病毒感染的方法,更适合在中国麻疹实验室网络推广应用。Objective To establish a new diagnosis method to detect Rubella virus infection for future use in Measles Laboratory Network in China. Methods 38 throat swabs collected from Shandong, Henan, and Anhui Provincial Measles Laboratories were detected respectively by 3 methods including viral isolation (combined with RT-PCR), IFA and Colorimetric Immunoassay simultaneously, and the sensitivity and specificity of 3 methods were compared and evaluated. Results The results of 3 methods were identical, totally 22 positive samples in 38 throat swabs were observed in the study, the positive rate is 57.996. Conclusion Compared with RT-PCR and IFA, Colorimetric immunoassay were more simple and convenient to detect Rubella virus infection. Furthermore, no special cost apparatus were needed, and the results can be judged only by naked eyes. Therefore, Colorimetric Immunoassay were more suited to applying in Measles Laboratories Network in China.
分 类 号:R373.11[医药卫生—病原生物学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3