电针后溪穴治疗急性腰扭伤的近远期疗效观察  

Observation on short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of electroacupuncture at Houxi (SI 3) on acute lumbar sprain

作　　者：吴耀持[1] 张必萌[1] 汪崇淼[1] 张峻峰[1] 邵萍[2] 刘桂珍[3] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学附属第六人民医院,上海200233 [2]上海市中医医院 [3]上海市普陀区中心医院

出　　处：《中国针灸》2007年第1期3-5,共3页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

基　　金：国家中医药管理局基金项目:03XDLZ24

摘　　要：目的:对比观察电针后溪穴与药物治疗急性腰扭伤的疗效差异。方法:将300例急性腰扭伤患者随机分组,每组150例。电针组电针后溪穴,每日1次,3次为一疗程;药物组用莫比可治疗,每日口服1次,每次7·5mg。两组分别在治疗7天和1个月后进行近期和远期疗效评定。结果:近期疗效比较,电针组有效率为97·3%,药物组有效率为89·2%,二者疗效比较差异有非常显著性意义(P<0·01);而远期疗效比较,电针组有效率为99·3%,药物组有效率为93·2%,二者疗效比较差异有非常显著性意义(P<0·01)。结论:电针后溪穴治疗急性腰扭伤,近期疗效和远期疗效均优于药物组。Objective To compare therapeutic effects of electroacupuncture at Houxi （SI 3） and medicine on acute lumbar sprain. Methods Three hundred cases of acute lumbar sprain were randomly divided into two groups, a electroacupuncture （EA） group and a medication group, 150 cases in each group. The EA group were treated with EA at Houxi （SI 3）, once each day, 3 sessions constituting one course, and the medication group with Mobike, once daily, 7.5 mg each time. Their therapeutic effects were evaluated after treatment for 7 days and one month respectively. Results For the short-term therapeutic effect, the effective rate was 97.3% in the EA group and 89.2% in the medication group with a very significant difference between the two groups （P〈0. 01）; for the long-term therapeutic effect, the effective rate was 99.3% in the EA group and 93.2% in the medication group with a very significant difference between the two groups （P〈0. 01）. Conclusion Both the short-term and the long-term therapeutic effects of EA at Houxi （SI 3） on acute lumbar sprain are better than those in the medication group.

关 键 词：电针 穴 后溪 急性病 腰扭伤/针灸疗法 

分 类 号：R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]