检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李延军[1]
机构地区:[1]福建公安高等专科学校法律系,福建福州350007
出 处:《闽江学院学报》2006年第6期24-28,共5页Journal of Minjiang University
摘 要:行政调查在现代行政法治中日益凸显其重要地位,但是我国缺乏完善的行政调查法律体系,立法对于行政调查与人权保障之间的冲突也缺乏有效调控。这主要源于传统行政法学对行政调查定位为附属的、过程性的行为,对其在行政法治中的独立价值缺乏足够认识。完善行政调查机制,构建法治政府,必须对行政调查的内涵、性质进行宏观上的再认识。Administrative investigation plays an increasingly important role in the modem administrative rule of law, but there is not a perfect legal system of it in our country. What's more, the effective regulation and control upon the conflicts between administrative investigation and the insurance of human fights is also in want by legislation. It is clue to the fact that the traditional Science of Administrative Law has evaluated administrative investigation as an attached, procedural behavior with insufficient recognition of its independent value in administrative role of law. Therefore, in order to construct perfect rule of law in administrative investigation, the connotation and nature of it should be re-recognized microscopically.
分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.151.249