论宪法规定公民权利宜用禁止性规则  

On Citizen Rights in Constitution has Better be Prescribed by Prohibitive Regulation

作　　者：邓联繁[1] 蒋清华[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学法学院,湖南长沙410083

出　　处：《河北法学》2007年第1期61-63,72,共4页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要：虽然各国宪法对公民权利实际上有两种规定方式,一是采用禁止性规则,二是采用授权性规则,但从理论上分析,宜采用禁止性规则。从宪法学上来讲,禁止性规则符合宪法乃授权于国之法、权利先于宪法、宪法控制权力的观念;从立法学上来说,禁止性规则更能表达防范国家权力可能侵犯公民权利的目的;从解释学上来看,禁止性规则能够消除“宪赋人权”的误解。Though there are two kinds of prescribed form about citizen rights on constitution in each country, one is by prohibitive regulation; the other is by authorizing regulation. However, it has better be prescribed by prohibitive regulation from theory analysis. On constitutional jurisprudence, prohibitive regulation consists with such ideas that constitution is the law that authorizes power to nation, right is before the law and constitution controls power. On legislative science, prohibitive regulation expresses the aim of preventing national power from invading citizen rights better. On interpretive science, prohibitive regulation can eliminate the misunderstanding of ＂human rights are authorized by constitution＂.

关 键 词：禁止性规则 授权性规则 公民权利 宪法 

分 类 号：D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]