检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈定霞[1] 罗燕萍[1] 曹敬荣[1] 周光[1] 杨喆[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军总医院微生物科,北京100853
出 处:《临床检验杂志》2007年第1期4-6,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
基 金:军队"十五"课题(编号01Q057)。
摘 要:目的比较研究临床实验室对AmpCβ内酰胺酶(AmpC酶)的表型检测方法,了解对头孢西丁不敏感的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌中产生AmpC酶和超广谱β内酰胺酶(ESBLs)的分布情况。方法利用加与不加3-氨基苯酚硼酸(APB)的头孢他啶、头孢噻肟和头孢西丁纸片进行APB纸片增强试验检测肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌的AmpC酶,并与Tris-EDTA纸片试验检测AmpC酶的结果进行比较。用CLSI纸片确认实验检测肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌产生的ESBLs。结果APB纸片增强试验与Tris-EDTA纸片法检测结果完全一致。对头孢西丁不敏感的62株肺炎克雷伯菌和74株大肠埃希菌中,分别检测到产AmpC酶41株(66.1%)和33株(45.0%)。AmpC酶和ESBLs同时存在的肺炎克雷伯菌占51.6%,单产AmpC酶和单产ESBLs的肺炎克雷伯菌分别为14.5%和21.0%;而大肠埃希菌则以单产ESBLs为主,占40.5%,单产AmpC酶及同时产生AmpC酶与ESBLs的分别占20.3%和24.3%。结论APB纸片增强试验和Tris-EDTA纸片试验操作简单,应用方便,成本低廉,均可用于临床实验室检测产AmpC酶的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠埃希菌。Objective To study the method for phenotype detection of AmpC beta-lactamase from Klebsiella pneumonlae and Escherichia coli ,and to investigate the distribution of AmpC beta-lactamase and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli which were unsusceptible to cefoxitin. Methods AmpC beta-lactamase from Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli were detected by 3-aminophenylboronic acid (APB) disk potentiation test in comparison with Tris-EDTA disk method. Ceftazidim, cefotaxim and eefoxitin with and without APB were used in the APB disk potentiation test. The disk confirmatory test for detection of ESBL approved by NCCLS was used for detection of ESBL. Results The APB disk potentiation test got good agreement with Tris-EDTA disk method. By detection using both methods 41 were AmpC beta-lactamase-producing in 62 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae unsusceptible to cefoxtin ( accounted for 66.1% ) and 33 were AmpC beta-lactamase-preducing in 74 strains of Escherichia coli unsusceptible to cefoxtin (accounted for 45.0% ) . In Klebsiella pneumoniae,AmpC beta-lactamase with ESBL together was very common. AmpC beta-lactamase only,ESBL only and AmpC beta-lactamase with ESBL accounted for 4.5% ,21.0% and 51.6% respectively. However, in Escherichia coli,ESBL only, ESBL with AmpC beta-lactamase, and AmpC beta-lactamase only accounted for 40.5% ,24. 3% and 20.3% respectively. Conclusion Both APB disk potentiation test and Tris-EDTA disk test were easy, convenient and cheap methods which could be applied for detection of AmpC beta-lactamase from Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli in clinical laboratory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44