不同物理因子对腹部感染性切口的愈合观察  

Comparison of healing effect of physical factors on belly infections

作　　者：杨全兴[1] 毕世庆[1] 曾莉[1] 

机构地区：[1]遵义医学院附属医院理疗科,贵州遵义563003

出　　处：《遵义医学院学报》2006年第4期359-360,共2页Journal of Zunyi Medical University

摘　　要：目的观察不同的物理因子对腹部感染性切口的愈合作用。方法200例腹部术后感染性切口随机分为微波组,微波加直线偏光近红外线组(SL),微波加He-Ne激光组,对感染性切口进行治疗。结果微波对感染性切口具有良好的愈合作用,微波加直线偏光近红外线及微波加He-Ne激光则疗效更显著,后两组与微波组比较,P﹤0.05,后两组与微波组疗效比较具有显著性差异,但后两组之间疗效无显著差异P>0.05。结论微波加直线偏光近红外线及微波加He-Ne激光对促进创面愈合比单纯应用微波疗效好。Objective To observe the healing of different physical factors on belly infections . Methods 200cases were nmdomly divided into three groups, i.e. （A）3Ocases were treated with microwave diathermy ;（B）90cases were treated with microwave diathermy combined with Super Lizer （ SL ） Made in Japan ; （C） 80cases were treated with microwave diathermy combined with He-Ne laser irradiation. Results In general, the healing effect of microwave diathermy on infections was good, and the effects of microwave diathermy combined with SL and microwave diathermy combined with He-Ne laser irradiation were even higher ,The differences between group A and B ,A and C were statistically significant, and there was no significantly statistic difference between group B and C .Conclusions microwave diathermy combined with SL or microwave diathermy combined with He-Ne laser irradiation is morn effective than microwave diathermy only in treatment of belly infections.

关 键 词：感染性切口 微波 直线偏光近红外线 He—Ne激光 

分 类 号：R632[医药卫生—外科学]