透针法治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的临床疗效评价  

Curative effect of penetrating needling therapy on knee osteogonarthritis

作　　者：李学武[1] 赵吉平[2] 汤立新[2] 王麟鹏 孙彩霞[2] 王燕平[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学针灸学院,北京100029 [2]北京中医药大学东直门医院,北京100700 [3]北京市中医医院,北京100010

出　　处：《北京中医药大学学报》2006年第12期844-846,共3页Journal of Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：国家中医药管理局资助项目(No.国中医药科2002ZL01)

摘　　要：目的研究透针技术在治疗膝关节骨性关节炎中的操作规范,综合分析和评价其临床疗效。方法选用阳陵泉透阴陵泉、外膝眼透内膝眼、膝阳关透曲泉、梁丘透血海4组穴位,采用透针法治疗膝关节骨性关节炎,通过循证医学研究方法,观察临床疗效。结果两组间临床综合疗效评定对比,具有极显著性差异;两组间疼痛疗效对比,具有显著性差异,透针组优于针刺组。结论透针法与常规毫针刺法治疗膝关节骨性关节炎在止痛、综合疗效等方面均有效,但透针法比常规毫针刺法效果更好。Objective To study the operation rules of penetrating needling therapy in treatment of knee osteogonarthritis, and to analyze and evaluate comprehensively the clinical effect of this therapy. Method The penetrating needling therapy was used to puncture in the acupoints of Yanglingquan （GB 34） to Yinlingquan （ SP 9）, Waixiyan （ EX-LE 5 ） to Neixiyan （ EX-LE 4 ）, Xiyangguan （ GB 33 ） to Ququan （ LR 8） and Liangqui （ ST 34） to Xuehai （ SP 10） to treat knee osteogonarthritis. The curative effect was observed by using the method of evidence-based medicine. Result There was a great significant difference between two groups after the evaluation and comparison of curative effect.in two groups. There was a significant difference in the curative effect on pain between two groups. The group of penetrating needling therapy had better result than the group of acupuncture. Conclusion The penetrating needling therapy and filiform needling therapy all have effect in relieving pain and comprehensive curative effect on knee osteogonarthritis, while the penetrating needling therapy has a better effect than filiform needling therapy.

关 键 词：透针法 毫针刺法 膝关节骨性关节炎 疗效评价 

分 类 号：R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]