检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《岭南现代临床外科》2007年第1期48-49,共2页Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
摘 要:目的回顾性分析下肢浅静脉曲张腔内激光治疗术(endovenous laser treatment,EVLT)与同期开展传统曲张静脉剥脱法的手术疗效。方法40例(46条肢体)下肢静脉曲张患者,在硬膜外或腰麻下,采用EVLT术;同期选择手术前条件相似的46条肢体,采用传统大隐静脉剥脱术。结果EVLT手术患者术后住院时间为2~5d,平均3.64d。传统剥脱术后平均8.12d;EVLT术较传统剥脱术的切口数少,创口小。结论EVLT术与传统剥脱术相比,术式简单又减小手术创伤。Objective To compare the therapeutic effects of endovenous laser treatment and traditional high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicosis of the lower limbs. Methods From January 2005 to December 2005, forty patients (46 limbs) received endolvenous laser treatment under spinal or epidural anesthesia. During the same period ,46 limbs underwent traditional high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein. Results The average postoperative hospital stay was 3.6 days in patients receiving EVLT, and 8.1 days for traditional stripping. Compared with traditional high ligation and stripping, the incision of EVLT was shorten and the number was less. Conclusion When compared with traditional high ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein, EVLT is easy to operate and minimally invasive.
分 类 号:R543.6[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222