睫状体剥离的超声诊断特征  

Ultrasound Diagnosis of Ciliary Body Detachment

作　　者：徐春军[1] 郁丽娟[1] 石国强[1] 刘玉凤[1] 张建华[1] 刘庆华[1] 

机构地区：[1]唐山市眼科医院,河北省唐山市063000

出　　处：《中国超声医学杂志》2007年第2期102-104,共3页Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨睫状体剥离的形态学改变。方法分别应用超声生物显微镜(UBM)、彩色多普勒超声显像仪、眼科A/B型超声诊断仪、前房角镜对172例186只眼睫状体剥离的形态进行观察。结果186只患眼均经UBM、彩色多普勒超声显像仪、眼科A/B超声诊断仪、房角镜检查,睫状体剥离的诊断率分别为100%、88%、55%、35%。结论UBM应为睫状体剥离诊断金标准;彩色多普勒超声诊断仪诊断率较高,尤其适宜眼科临床推广;B超诊断率较低,但对条件有限的单位仍应列为一种检查手段;房角镜检查局限性较多,但为唯一的光学检查手段,定位准确,应与其他方法联合应用。Objective To evaluate the morphological changes of ciliary body detachment. Methods A total of 186 eyes （in 172 cases） with ciliary body detachment were examined via ultrasound biomicroscopy （UBM）, color Doppler imaging, A/B-scan ultrsound and genioscopy. Results The diagnostic rate of UBM, color Doppler imaging, A/B-scan ultrasound and genioscopyin the 186 eyes was 100%, 88% （163/186）, 55% （103/186） and 35% （66/ 186 ）, respectively. Conclusions UBM is the golden standard for diagnosing ciliary body detachment. The diagnosis rate of color Doppler imaging is higher, and can be popularly and easily applied. As to B ultrasound, the rate is lower and may be used in some hospitals. Genioscopy is limited and should be adopted and combined with other methods.

关 键 词：睫状体剥离 超声生物显微镜 彩色多普勒超声诊断仪 B超 房角镜 

分 类 号：R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]