检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张中秋[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学法律史学研究院,北京100088
出 处:《南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学)》2007年第1期118-124,共7页Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(05JJD820014)
摘 要:现今学术界有关东亚法的整体认识,大致有新中华法系、东亚普通法和东亚法系这样几种代表性论说。以法系理论为视点,我们观察到东亚共同的法律传统在近代开始发生变革,中华法系在西法东进中趋于解体。如果以构成法系的要件为标准来衡量现今的东亚地区法,可以确认现在还没有法系意义上的东亚法,包括东亚普通法、东亚法系和新中华法系都是不存在的。但同时我们又必须看到,现今东亚地区法确实由于历史传统和近代继受的原因,加上地区共体化的推动,形成了某些类同与趋同的现象,这也许预示着未来东亚法的某种可能走向。According to a prevailing understanding of East Asian Law, there are in general such representative classifications as new Chinese legal genealogy, East Asian common law and East Asian legal genealogy. The author holds that the common legal tradition of East Asia began to change early in the modem times and Chinese legal genealogy started to disintegrate with the incoming of western law. Judged by the criteria of constitutive requirements of legal genealogy, the East Asian Law as a legal genealogy has not come into being yet, and the same is true to East Asian common law, East Asian legal genealogy and new Chinese legal genealogy. Meanwhile, the author agrees that, owing to the influence of both tradition and regionalization, the laws of different regions in East Asia do share some characters. This may indicate a changing trend of East Asian Law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188