检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]石家庄陆军指挥学院心理教研室,河北石家庄050084 [2]西南大学心理学院,重庆400715
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2007年第1期10-12,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:重庆市重点文科基地项目(项目号:200301003)
摘 要:目的:初步探讨Tuckman拖延中文量表的适用性,并进行信、效度分析。方法:随机选取259名大学生进行35个项目的Tuckman拖延量表测验,同时进行时间管理行为、自尊和自我效能测验。结果:因素分析抽取3个因素,共包含20个项目,构成三因素拖延倾向量表:拖延倾向,拖延动机和拖延归因。信度分析表明,三个因素的Cronbach!系数分别为0.81,0.85,0.78。以时间管理行为、自尊和自我效能作为效标,相关分析结果显示拖延量表的三个因素与各种效标之间存在显著的负相关。在三个因素中,拖延归因存在显著的性别差异,而拖延倾向存在显著的年龄差异。结论:拖延是一种多维度的心理结构,初步形成的拖延量表可以作为评价大学生拖延倾向的工具。Objective: The research aims to explore the usability of Tuckman Procrastination Scale in Chinese college students. Methods: 259 subjects were investigated by 32-item Tuckman Procrastination,and Time Management Inventory,Serf-esteem scale and Serf-efficacy scale were also used. Results: The three factors (procrastination tendency, motivation, and attribution) were extracted by factor analysis and 20 items were included in the Procrastination Scale (PS). The internal consistency was 0.81,0.85 and 0.78 respectively. In addition, there were also significant negative correlations between the three factors and time management behavior, self-esteem and serf-efficacy. Furthermore, there was significant gender difference in procrastination tendency and motivation, and significant age difference in procrastination tendency, Conclusion: Procrastination is a multi-dimension constructs, the developed scale in present study is available to assess the procrastination tendency of college students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.21.222