检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王德安[1] 高金鸾[1] 王晨生[1] 王明荣[1] 刘洪涛[1]
机构地区:[1]中国石油中心医院,廊坊065000
出 处:《中国医学影像学杂志》2007年第1期29-31,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
摘 要:目的:探讨超声测值口算法预测胎儿体重的可行性。材料和方法:对230例胎儿的头围、腹围、进行超声测量。参照出生时体重对比分析口算法和公式法预测胎儿体重的准确性。结果:口算法预测体重与出生体重符合184例,符合率占84%;公式法预测体重与出生体重符合200例,符合率占86.8%,两种方法误差分析无显著差异。结论:口算法与公式法比较预测胎儿体重的准确性无显著差异,但口算法方法简单,更具临床实用性。Purpose: A simplified estimation predicting the body weight of fetus based on ultrasonic measuring values was introduced in the current study. Materials and Methods: Ultrasonography was employed to measure the circumferences of head and abdomen of 230 fetus. Then the body weight of the fetus was estimated by a simplified algorism, and by a classical fetal-mass calculation formula. The estimated values was verified by the real birth weights of those neonates. Results: The estimation by the simplified method was consistent with the birth weight in 184 cases, with coincidence rate of 84% ; while classical formula obtained correct prediction in 200 cases (86.8%). There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods. Conclusion: The simplified estimation based on ultrasonic measurements was feasible in predicting the body weight of a fetus.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229