不同手法针刺对内毒素致热家兔体温的影响  

Influence of Different Needling Methods on Fever Caused by E. Bacillus Coll Injection in Rabbit

作　　者：方剑乔[1] 林咸明[1] 王月芳[1] 陈海英[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江中医学院针灸推拿系,杭州310009

出　　处：《针刺研究》1996年第3期50-54,共5页Acupuncture Research

基　　金：浙江省教委课题

摘　　要：以大肠杆菌内毒素致热家兔作为实热模型，观察了致热后不同手法针刺治疗对家兔体温的影响。结果发现，捻转泻法、电针泻法和综合泻法均有明显的相对阵热作用，尤其表现在针刺后的即时效应和降低发热高峰值的作用，三组中，以捻转泻法和综合泻法的效果更佳。捻转补法除对发热曲线有轻微的影响外，无明显的即时效应和对友热高峰的抑制效应。本实验结果表明，在清热效应上，手法补泻有明显区别，手法操作与电针操作亦有一定区别，而单、复式泻法间无差异。初步验证了“实则泻之”的补泻规律和不同手法的实际意义。The theory Of reinforcement and reduction with acupuncture is one of the important contents ofthe needling techniques in acupuncture. In order to verify the theory, experimental fever caused by ve-nous injection of E. Bacillus coll in rabbits were treated by acupuncture at Quchi(LI 11 ) with differentneedling methods (reinforcing or reducing) and stimulations (acupuncture or electroacupuncture). Theresults showed that each of the three reducing techniques with simple rotating of needle, rotation withliftingthrusting needle and electroacupuncture presented the fever-subduing effects, especially obtain-ing the immediate effect and lowering the peak of fever. Among them, the former two had the betterresult than electroacupuncture.The reinforcing technique with rotating needle did not give rise to thesignificant effect on lowering fever'The result indicates that there exist significant differences in the effect on fever-subduing betweenrein forcing and reducing methods with acupuncture and between acupuncture and electroacupuncture.The simple reducing needling technique share the same therapeutic result with compound one. Thework provides avaluable example for further laboratory study of reinforcing-reducing theory ofacupuncture.

关 键 词：针刺补泻手法 电针 内毒素 发热 

分 类 号：R245.97[医药卫生—针灸推拿学] R255.105[医药卫生—中医临床基础]