在历史与虚构之间——《押沙龙,押沙龙》的叙事策略解读  

Between the History and Fabrication——An Interpretation of the Narrative Tactics of ABSOLAM, ABSOLAM

作　　者：俞全华[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学中文系,江西南昌330047

出　　处：《唐山师范学院学报》2007年第1期24-27,共4页Journal of Tangshan Normal University

摘　　要：在《押沙龙,押沙龙》中,福克纳打破了文学与历史的界限,采用了小说创作的虚构策略。在叙述层次的设置、叙述者的选择、叙述声音的迥异以及叙述的真实与否方面,充分表达了他对美国南方历史中黑人种族问题的深切关注。然而他所传递的“历史”却丧失了传统意义上的客观真实性,而凸现为新历史主义批评家所谓的“新历史”或“文本化”的历史。In ABSOLAM, ABSOLAM, William Faulkner broke the boundary of literature and history, and adopted the fictional tactics of literary creation. On the aspect of setting up the narrative levels, choosing the narrators, narrators＇ different voices and their reliability, he fully expressed his sympathy for the racial issues in the history of the south of America But the ＂history＂ he conveyed had lost the objective authenticity in traditional sense, and represented the so-called ＂new history＂ or ＂textual history＂ referred by critics of new historical criticism.

关 键 词：《押沙龙 押沙龙》 叙述层次 叙述可靠性 新历史主义 

分 类 号：I712.074[文学—其他各国文学]