电脑治疗仪与传统手术治疗轻中度痔疗效比较  

Comparison of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Computerized Instrument Therapy vs Traditional Surgical Therapy for Mild and Moderate Hemorrhoids

作　　者：朱钢[1] 谭静范[1] 林梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京市肛肠医院,北京100032

出　　处：《中国肛肠病杂志》2007年第1期38-39,共2页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology

摘　　要：对轻、中度痔应用电脑治疗仪与传统手术治疗效果进行对比分析，期望为痔手术方案的选择提供依据。将需手术治疗的轻、中度痔患者100例，随机分为两组各50例，分别应用电脑治疗仪与传统手术治疗。观察术后疼痛、排尿、出血情况，基本恢复一般正常工作时间及随访1年的疗效。两组手术时间、术后疼痛、排尿情况均无显著差别。术后无大出血。两组病例随访1年，无肛门狭窄、肛门功能障碍。结果表明，对轻、中度痔的手术治疗，两组手术方法都具有安全、有效、简便、省时的特点，但电脑综合治疗仪能缩短治疗时间。The therapeutic efficacy of computerized instrument therapy and traditional surgical therapy for mild and moderate hemorrhoids was compared in an attempt of providing basis for therapeutic choice. One hundred patients with mild or moderate hemorrhoids were divided randomly into two groups, 50 for each group,receiving computerized instrument therapy and traditional surgical therapy respectively. The aspects of postoperative pain, frequency of urination, bleeding,recovery status and findings of one-year follow up in the two groups were compared. As results, there were no differences in operation duration, postoperative pain and urination between the two groups. There was no postoperative hematorrhea and no anal stricture or anal malfunction in both groups follow-up one year. It is concluded that these two therapies are all safe, effective,simple and save time for mild and moderate hemorrhoids,while computerized instrument therapy is better in terms of shorterning treatment duration of time.

关 键 词：痔 电脑治疗仪 手术 疗效 

分 类 号：R657.18[医药卫生—外科学]