检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国民康医学》2007年第5期175-177,共3页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
摘 要:目的:评价丙咪嗪配合认知疗法对抑郁症的疗效。方法:将90例抑郁症患者随机分为3组,A组(认知疗法治疗组)30例,B组(丙咪嗪治疗组)30例,C组(丙咪嗪+认知疗法治疗组)30例,疗程6周,采用Ham ilton抑郁量表(HAMD)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和副反应量表(TESS)在治疗前和治疗后2、4、6周末评定疗效和不良反应。结果:三组病人在治疗后4周时,A、C两组减分与B组减分差异有显著性(P<0.05);治疗6周时A、B两组差异无显著性(P>0.05),C组效果显著优于A、B两组(P<0.01),且C组丙咪嗪剂量和TESS评分明显低于B组。结论:丙咪嗪配合认知疗法治疗抑郁症是一种经济、安全有效、依从性好的方法。Objective:To assess the efficacy of imipramine combined with cognitive - behavioral therapy (CBT) in the treatment of depressive patients. Methods :90 depressive patients were randomized into A group( CBT group)( n = 30 ), B group (Imipramine group )( n = 30)and C group( Imipramine combined with CBT group)( n = 30) and studied for 6weeks . HAMD,SDS and TESS were used to assess the efficacy and side effects before and 2 weeks ,4 weeks and 6weeks after the treatment. Results: by the end of 4 weeks, there was significant difference in efficacy between A,C groups and B groups(P 〈0.05) ,by the end of 6 weeks, there was significant difference in efficacy between c group and A,B groups ,there was no significant difference in efficacy between A and B group (P 〉 0.05), and the doses of imipramine and the TESS scores of C group were significantly lower than that of B group. Conclusions-Imipramine combined with CBT was an economic, convenient and safe treatment in depressive patient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188