机构地区:[1]山东大学第二医院心脏外科,山东济南250033 [2]济南市第四人民医院,山东济南250031 [3]济南市中心医院心脏外科,山东济南250013
出 处:《山东大学学报(医学版)》2007年第2期130-134,共5页Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
摘 要:目的:通过建立兔在体肺热缺血再灌注模型,探讨依达拉奉对兔实验性肺缺血再灌注损伤的影响及作用机制。方法:采用兔肺原位热缺血再灌注损伤模型进行研究。24只大白兔随机分为三组:①对照组(C组,n=8),开胸后不阻断肺门,静脉缓慢推注生理盐水5 ml/kg;②缺血再灌注组(I/R组,n=8),左肺接受60 min的缺血,然后接受60 min再灌注,于缺血前5 min静脉缓慢推注生理盐水5 ml/kg;③依达拉奉干预组(E组,n=8),于缺血前5 min静脉缓慢推注依达拉奉10 mg/kg(5 ml/kg),左肺接受60 min的缺血,然后接受60 min再灌注。120 min实验结束时,留取各组动物血液标本,测定血浆丙二醛(MDA)含量及超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性;收集支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF),检测支气管肺泡灌洗液中白细胞计数、中性粒细胞百分比及肺通透性指数;留取肺组织标本,测定肺组织湿、干重量,计算干/湿重比(D/W)及行肺组织病理检查。结果:I/R组血浆丙二醛含量、支气管肺泡灌洗液中蛋白含量、支气管肺泡灌洗液中WBC总数及中性粒细胞百分比明显高于C组及E组(P<0.01),E组与C组比较,无统计学意义(P>0.05);I/R组血浆SOD活性、血清蛋白含量及肺组织干/湿重比(D/W)较C组及E组显著降低(P<0.05),E组与C组比较,无统计学意义(P>0.05);肺通透指数I/R组明显高于E组与C组(P<0.01),E组显著高于C组(P<0.05);肺组织病理显示,E组肺泡内出血、炎性细胞浸润、渗出及间质水肿均较I/R组为轻。结论:依达拉奉通过清除氧自由基、抑制脂质过氧化,对兔肺原位热缺血再灌注损伤有一定保护作用。Objective: To investigate whether or not edaravone has an effect on reducing lung isehemiarepetfusion injury in rabbits. Methods: Twenty-four rabbits were randomly divided into three groups: ① the control group(group C, n = 8): received stemotomy only and no ischemia; ② the ischemia/repeffusion group(group I/R, n = 8) : the left lungs of rabbits were rendered ischemia by ligating the left pulmonary hili for 60 minutes followedby 60 minutes repeffusion; ③ the edaravone group(group E, n = 8) : the left lungs were rendered ischemia for 60 minutes followed by 60 minutes reperfusion, and 10 mg/kg edaravone was administered intravenously 5 minutes prior to ischemia. Blood MDA and SOD were measured. Protein concentrations, WBC count, and PMN percentage in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid were determined. Samples of left lung tissue were sent for determining the left lung dry-to-wet weight ratio and evaluating the pathologic changes. Results: Blood MDA level, protein concentrations, WBC count and PMN percentage in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of group I/R were significantly higher than those of group C and group E( P 〈 0.01 ), and there was not significant difference between group C and group E ( P 〉 0.05) ; serum SOD activity, serum albumin concentration and left lung dry-to-wet ratio of of group I/R were significantly lower than those of group C and group E( P 〈 0.05), and there was not significant difference between group C and group E ( P 〉 0.05) ; the pulmonary permeability index of group I/R was significantly higher than that of group C and group E( P 〈 0.01 ); pathologic evaluations revealed mild alterations in alveolar structure, less white blood cell infiltration and less interstitial edema in group E than in group I/R. Conclusions: This study suggests that intravenous edaravone prior to ischemia attenuates the lung ischemia reperfusion injury in rabbits through its radical scavenging and antioxidant action.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...