检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽农业大学资源环境学院,合肥230036 [2]中国农业大学资源与环境学院土壤和水系,北京100094
出 处:《农业工程学报》2007年第2期54-59,共6页Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展资助项目(G1999011709);教育部跨世纪人才计划项目;教育部科学技术重点项目(03169)资助
摘 要:通过3年田间定位试验利用氮素平衡方程模拟了传统水氮管理和优化水氮管理下连作蔬菜地土壤无机态氮含量的变化,分析了两种水氮管理对土壤氮素损失量及氮素利用效率的影响。结果表明:优化水氮管理下花椰菜、苋菜和菠菜生长期内土壤平均(2年或3年)氮素损失量(氨挥发、反硝化和硝态氮淋洗的总和)只有传统水氮管理下花椰菜、苋菜和菠菜生长期内土壤平均氮素损失量的9%、8%和18%;氮素利用效率是传统水氮管理下各蔬菜氮素利用效率的2.3倍、3.2倍、1.7倍,而两处理间蔬菜平均产量并无显著差异。A vegetable sequence system(Cauliflower-Amaranth-Spinach) used by farmer was set up. Changes of soil mineral nitrogen in vegetable field were simulated by using nitrogen balance model. The loss of soil mineral nitrogen and Nitrogen Use Efficiency(NUE) were analyzed under traditional and improved water and N-fertilizer managements. The results showed that the average soil mineral nitrogen losses (the total of ammonia volatilization and denitrification and nitrate leaching) of vegetable field during Cauliflower and Amaranth and Spinach growth under improved conditions were about 9% and 8% and 18% of those of traditional water and nitrogen management. But NUE of Cauliflower and Amaranth and Spinach were 2.3 times and 3.2 times and 1.7 times as much as those of traditional water and N-fertilizer management. Yield of vegetable was not significantly different under improved and traditional water and N-fertilizer management practices.
分 类 号:S158.2[农业科学—土壤学] S63[农业科学—农业基础科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229