颜游秦《汉书决疑》佚文与颜师古《汉书注》比义  

A Comparative Study Between Yan Youqin's The Annotations of Hanshu and Yan Shigu's The Commentaries of Hanshu

作　　者：王鑫义[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学历史系,安徽合肥230039

出　　处：《史学月刊》2007年第3期114-120,共7页Journal of Historical Science

摘　　要：颜师古撰《汉书注》曾取义于颜游秦《汉书决疑》。然而,颜师古却没有将《汉书决疑》列入参考书目,撰书中亦未称引。其学术失范行为受到了清代学者的严厉批评,但迄今学者未曾就《汉书决疑》佚文与《汉书注》进行全面的比义研究。在借鉴前人成果的基础上,就《汉书决疑》的19条佚文与《汉书注》的相关注文作逐条比义,可以发现颜游秦的15条注文被颜师古完全采纳或基本采纳,占今所能见颜游秦佚文的近80%,故后人谓师古注尝窃采游秦义为不诬。但瑕不掩瑜,师古注比游秦《决疑》丰富得多,是一部较为系统、全面的《汉书》注本。Yan Shigu hadn ＇t mentioned his reference book The Annotations of Hanshu which was written by Yah Youqin when he wrote his book The Commentaries of Hanshu. His disloyalty to learning received severe criticism from scholars of Qing Dynasty. However, we can＇t track down papers on systematically comparing The Annotations of Hanshu with The Commentaries of Hanshu. Based on previous studies, this paper compares the two books on related nineteen items, of which fifteen items （about eighty percent） are identical. This proves the saying that Yan Shigu had plagiarized Yan Youqin＇s work.

关 键 词：颜游秦 《汉书决疑》 颜师古 《汉书注》 比义 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]