检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:伍玉联[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学法学院,北京100871
出 处:《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2007年第1期74-79,共6页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
摘 要:从量能课税的含义出发,引出形式平等和实质平等的话题,然后对平等概念进行了法哲学史上的梳理。从古往先贤的理论里认识到形式平等和实质平等的深层含义,得出量能课税原则本质上是也只可能是一种形式平等或者机会平等,但是是一种含有实质平等追求的形式平等,区别于纯粹的形式平等,也区别于实质平等。这样,就对流行的量能课税原则是对实质平等的追求的观点进行了修正。Starting with the analysis of the principles of taxing on capacity, the author presents the topics of formal equality and virtual equality and has the concept of equality analyzed jurisprudentially. On the basis of the preceding theories of the formal and virtual equality, the author concludes that the principle of taxing on capacity is and is only a formal equality or equality of opportunity, but with a pursuit of virtual equality and different from pure formal equality and virtual equality, and gives a correction to the papular viewpoints that the principle of taxing on capacity is a pursuit of virtual equality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38