“同命”真该“同价”?——对死亡损害赔偿的民法思考  

Should the same life really be the same price?——discussion of death damage compensation in the Civil Law

作　　者：孙鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民法研究所,重庆400031

出　　处：《法学论坛》2007年第2期112-118,共7页Legal Forum

摘　　要：死亡损害赔偿并非对生命权本身的救济,而是对因侵害生命权所引起的各种现实利益损失的补偿。由于受害人个体情况的差异,赔偿的结果却千差万别,植根于“同命同价”思维的死亡损害赔偿定额化是对实质平等精神的背离,我国的死亡损害赔偿法不应追随定额化的赔偿模式,而应尽可能地对死亡损害赔偿额进行精细的个别化计算。Death damage compensation is not a kind of relief measure to life rights itself, but the compensation to the loses of actual benefits because of the life rights violation. As a result of the difference of victim individual situations, the compensation result will be also obviously different. Death damage compensation fixed quantity which takes root in the thought of ＂the same life must be the same price＂ diverges from the spirit of substantive equality. In China, The Death Damage Compensation Law should not follow the fixed quantity compensation pattern, but the individual pattern.

关 键 词：生命权 损害赔偿 平等 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]