输血安全法的比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Blood Transfusion Safety Law

作　　者：唐荣智[1] 孙莹莹[1] 吕子瑜[1] 王珍[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东理工大学法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2007年第1期25-31,共7页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：在世界范围内,关于输血安全的法律调整有一个认识与发展的过程。现今两大法系殊途同归,就血液是产品,实行严格责任,用输血保险转嫁风险等,有了共识与规范。从比较法研究中,我们可以获得启示与借鉴,顺应历史潮流,构建我国输血安全法律制度,促进社会和谐。Worldwide legal adjustment for blood transfusion safety is progressive both in recognition and in development. The two main legal systems of the world have come to agree that blood can be regarded as product, that we should apply strict liability in dealing with blood product issues and that we should apply for blood insurance for risk shift. Through comparative studies, we get insight from their consensus, which can be used as reference when we make our blood transfusion safety law. We should go with the tide of historical development when making our blood transfusion safety law so as to promote the harmony of the society.

关 键 词：血液产品 严格责任 风险转嫁 比较法 

分 类 号：D922.54[政治法律—民商法学]