尘肺治疗效果综合评价研究  

A comprehensive evaluation of the treatment effects for pneumoconiosis

作　　者：刘世杰[1] 秦孝发[1] 张侠[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京医科大学劳动卫生教研室,生物数学与生物统计教研室

出　　处：《中华劳动卫生职业病杂志》1996年第2期65-67,共3页Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases

基　　金：国家"八五"攻关课题

摘　　要：为科学地评价尘肺治疗效果，根据Ｘ线胸片、临床症状、肺功能和生化４项指标的变化在反映尘肺治疗效果实际意义的大小，给以不同权重，先对每一病例分别进行打分，再对全部病例进行累计加权，由此获得对尘肺疗效进行综合评价的方法。结果表明、单位甲、乙的７８例病人中其治疗组与对照组得分分别为（５７．２２±９．５２）分和（５０．８８±１０．８９）分，为验证本方法的可行性，对单位丙２９例病人进行了同样的计算，其治疗组和对照组得分分别为（６７．６３±８．３４）及（５７．３０±１４．５９）分。所有治疗、对照两组间比较差异均有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５）。此外还对治疗和对照组进行了判别分析，其判别正确严率单位甲、乙均为７１．７９％，单位丙为７２．４１％。表明该方法是一个简便、易行的综合疗效评价方法。To evaluate the treatment effects on pneumoconiosis scientifically,the possibility bysumming up the scores of chest X-ray radiograph,clinical symptoms,pulmonary function and biochemi-cal indexes,which were calculated by taking into account both the situation of their changes and theirpractical significance,was investigated.The summing-up scores were 57.22±9. 52 for treated group(n=54)and 50.88±10.89 for control group(n=24)from Unit A and B,and 67.63±8.34(n=19)and57.30±14.59(n=10)respectively from Unit C. Discrimination analvsis revealed that the correct ratesof discrimination were 71.79%for Unit A and B,and 72. 41%for Unit C.indicating that the method in-troduced here might be simple and feasible.

关 键 词：尘肺 治疗 综合评价 

分 类 号：R135.2[医药卫生—劳动卫生]