检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢少锋[1] 王忱[1] 刘怀萍[1] 邱树彬[1]
机构地区:[1]汕头大学医学院第二附属医院麻醉科,广东汕头515041
出 处:《海南医学》2007年第3期45-46,共2页Hainan Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较锁骨手术的三种神经阻滞的麻醉效果。方法60例锁骨手术患者随机分为三组,每组20例。A组行颈丛阻滞,B组行臂丛阻滞,C组行颈丛加臂丛联合阻滞,三组用相同局麻药(1%利多卡因、0.25%布比卡因混合液)。连续监测血压(BP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SPO2)、心电图(ECG),分别记录麻醉前、麻醉后15min、切皮时、骨折复位时4个时点SBP,HR、SPO2的数值。记录各组麻醉效果及并发症。结果A、B、C组麻醉优良率分别为65%、65%、95%,C组与A或B组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。A、B、C组需辅助镇痛药者分别有13、14和1例,C组与A或B组比较差异有显著性(P<0.01)。C组患者手术期间SBP,HR变化小,与A、B组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。三组患者的SPO2均>97%,A组和C组各有1例出现霍纳氏综合症,A组有1例声音稍嘶哑,15min内自行消失,各组随访一周未发现其他并发症。结论对于锁骨手术,颈丛加臂丛联合阻滞比单独颈丛阻滞或臂丛阻滞效果好。Objective To compare the analgesic effects of three kinds of nerve block on collarbone surgery. Methods 60 patients, ASA physical status of Ⅰ-Ⅱ, undergoing collarbone surgery were randomly allocated into three groups: Group A was given cervical plexus nerve block (CPNB); Group B was given brachial plexus block (BPNB); Group C was given CPNB combination with BPNB. All patients were use the same local anaesthetic drugs (1%Lidocaine and 0.25% bubivacaine), The BP, SPO2 and ECG were simultaneously monitored, The analgesia effects and complications were recorded. Results The satisfactory analgesia ration were 95% in group C, and 65% in group A or B, group C was significantly higher than group A or B(P〈0.05). The cardiovascular respanse to operative stimulation was mild, systolic blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly different compared with those before operative in group C (p〉0.05), which were significantly incread in group A and B (p〈0.05), complications occurred 1 cases in group A and C, 0 cases in group B. Conclusions CPNB combination with BPNB provides better analgesia effect for collarbone surgery than CPNB or BPNB alone.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145