检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周黎明[1]
机构地区:[1]河南大学现代法制研究所,河南开封475001
出 处:《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2007年第2期80-83,共4页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:我国有关法律对解决涉外民事管辖权冲突最为有效的措施——协议管辖原则进行了规定,但却存在限制过多的问题。应尽可能减少对协议管辖的不当限制,最大限度地扩大协议管辖的适用范围。同时,我国立法还应增补一些其他的能够有效解决管辖权冲突的原则和措施,诸如先受理法院管辖原则、不方便法院原则等,以协调国家之间关于涉外民事管辖权的纷争。The doctrine of consensual jurisdiction, which is regarded as the most effective applicable way to deal with the jurisdiction conflicts of the civil litigation concerning foreign affairs, has already been prescribed by some related laws of our country. Considering too many improper limitations to the application of the doctrine of consensual jurisdiction under these related current laws, the article concludes that the new legislation should reduce the current legislative provisions on improper limitations as few as possible so as to widen the application scope of the doctrine of consensual jurisdiction to a large extent and meanwhile some other effective ways such as the doctrine of court received first, the doctrine of forum non conveniences and so on should also been prescribed in the new legislation in order to coordinate the disputable problems among countries relating to the jurisdiction conflicts of the civil litigation concerning foreign affairs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147