草根动员与农民群体利益的表达机制——四个个案的比较研究  

Grassroots Mobilization and the Mechanism of Interest Expression of the Peasants Group: A comparative study of four cases

作　　者：应星[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学社会学院

出　　处：《社会学研究》2007年第2期1-23,共23页Sociological Studies

基　　金：教育部资助项目"弱势群体的群体利益表达机制研究"(06JA840020);福特基金会资助项目"中国基层行政争议解决机制实证研究"的中期成果之一

摘　　要：本文首先提出研究农民群体利益的表达机制是事关社会稳定和社会和谐的一个重大问题,然后从一个特定的角度——草根动员——来切入对这个问题的分析。作者通过四个个案的比较研究,突破了西方社会运动研究范式与印度底层社会研究范式在有组织的精英场域与无组织的底层场域之间的简单对立;作者拓展了对“依法抗争”概念的理解,并批判了国内目前流行的农民群体利益表达已进入“以法抗争”新阶段的观点。作者认为草根行动者是一个既不完全认同于精英、也不完全代表底层,而是有着自身独特行动目标和逻辑的行动者。草根行动者所进行的草根动员,使农民群体利益表达机制在表达方式的选择上具有权宜性,在组织上具有双重性,在政治上具有模糊性。草根动员既是一个动员参与的过程,同时也是一个进行理性控制并适时结束群体行动的过程。By a comparative study of four cases, this article breaks through the debate of paradigm between the organized elite field and the unorganized bottom field, raised by western social movement study and Indian bottom society study respectively. This article expands the concept of “policybased resistance', and criticizes the popular idea that the interest expressions of the peasants group have arrived at a new stage of “resistance by policy'. It is proposed that the grassroots actors constructed a very special group with unique goal and logic in their action. Grassroots mobilization makes the mechanism of interest expression of the peasants group manifest flexibility on the methods of interest expression, dualism on the organization, ambiguousness on the political indirection. Grassroots mobilization is both the process of mobilizing participation, and the process of reasonably controlling and stopping the collective action in good time.

关 键 词：草根动员 草根行动者 农民群体利益表达 双重性 

分 类 号：C912.81[经济管理]