检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央财经大学经济学院 [2]中国人民大学经济学院
出 处:《管理世界》2007年第3期23-31,共9页Journal of Management World
基 金:教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持项目"资助。
摘 要:对中国1990~2005年季度数据的SVAR分析显示,货币政策的通胀效果是滞后的,而且通货膨胀表现出惯性的特征。本文通过对当前两类主流宏观模型的模拟发现:完全前瞻的新凯恩斯主义粘性价格模型不符合货币冲击的历史效果,而Mankiw等提出的粘性信息模型则具有更强的合理性。这一理论解释力方面存在的差别主要源自,新凯恩斯主义粘性信息模型保持着理性预期假设,而粘性信息模型对理性预期完全信息进行了放松。因此,粘性信息模型行为宏观经济模型为我国货币政策效果讨论和最优货币政策研究提供了更好的理论基础。The results of SVAR analyses of China's quarter data (1990.1-2005.1) show that the monetary policies have had a hysteresis effect on inflation and that China's inflation has exhibited the characteristics of inertia. By the simulation of the present two kinds of mainstream macro models, we have found that the new Keynesian completely- forward- looking sticky price models do not accord with historical facts, the occurrence of which were affected by money, and that, however, the sticky information theory model provided by Mankiw and other writers is more rational. The difference of the two theories in the power of interpretation lies mainly in the fact that the new Keynesian sticky information model holds the rational expectation hypothesis while the sticky information model constructed by Mankiw does not pay so much attention to it. Therefore, the behavioral macroeconomic model of the sticky information built by Mankiw has provided a better theoretic foundation for the discussion on the effect of China's monetary policy and for the research into China's optimal monetary policies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3