判决概念的法理分析——两种意义下的判决观  

Theoretically Analysis on the Concept of Judgment——By View of Substance and Procedure

作　　者：赵元成[1] 

机构地区：[1]杭州师范学院,浙江杭州310036

出　　处：《浙江万里学院学报》2007年第2期125-127,137,共4页Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University

摘　　要：对于判决概念的界定是理解判决理论的前提。我国传统诉讼法学理论将判决解释为法官对案件实体问题的决定,这种解释忽略了法官在得出结论之前的推理和论证的重要性。只有从实体和程序两种意义上进行分析,才能科学地认识判决的内在规定性。实体意义上的判决观着力于判决之于当事人之间法律争议的效果,而程序意义上的判决观则强调判决是法官将既定的法律规范涵摄到案件事实并得出结论的过程。The concept of judgment is the foundation of judgment theory.In traditional theory of procedural law, judgment is interpreted as the decision on substantive facts of the case, which neglects the significance of reasoning and argumentation before judgment.It＇ s important to analyze on the basis of both substance and procedure in order to comprehend the connotation of judgment.The viewpoint on judgment of substance attaches importance to conclusion of dispute between the litigants.The viewpoint on judgment of procedure emphasizes that judgment is a process, in which judges subsume legal norms under case facts to draw a conclusion.

关 键 词：诉讼 判决 实体 程序 

分 类 号：D90-051[政治法律—法学理论]