检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡吕银[1]
出 处:《河南省政法管理干部学院学报》2007年第2期77-81,共5页Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law
基 金:国家社科基金项目"农村集体土地所有权法律制度研究"的阶段性成果(项目批准号:05BFX031)
摘 要:中国物权立法所存在的巨大争议很大程度上源于物权立法的价值不清。物权立法的价值在于继受物权法律文明、承接现行宪政体制、反映时代国情特点,为当今中国制定一部真正意义的财产基本法。据此,物权立法新一轮争论正反双方的观点和方式都有失偏颇。但这场争论却能促使人们去认真反思物权立法的失误,以及如何使物权立法趋于完善。The big controversy among the right in rem legislation of China comes from the implicit value of the legislation of the right in rem. The very value of the legislation of the right in rem does exist in inheriting the civilization of the right in rein law, connecting the system of constitution and reflecting the fundamental realities of the country of times, thus enacts a fundamental property law of real significance for the current China. That is to say both sides of the new round controversy of the legislation of the people to meditate the errors in the legislation of right in rem are not right. But this round of controversy can lead the right in rem and how to better the legislation of the right in rem.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.12