检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李素娟[1] 刘爱芝[1] 茹桃勤[2] 武予清[1] 韩松[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所,河南郑州450002 [2]河南省林业厅项目办公室,河南郑州450003
出 处:《华北农学报》2007年第1期141-144,共4页Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica
基 金:国家"九五";"十五"科技攻关项目(96-005-01-02)(2001BA509B03);科技部重大专项(2001BA507A02)
摘 要:应用群落生态学结构变化特征的研究方法,研究了小麦与油菜、荷兰豆间作和单作麦田3种栽培模式条件下对麦田麦蚜及主要天敌群落的影响。结果表明,捕食性天敌的丰盛度和昆虫群落的稳定性,麦套荷兰豆最高,其次为麦套油菜田、单作麦田最低;麦套荷兰豆田麦蚜亚群落稳定性较好,单作麦田捕食性天敌亚群落的稳定性较好。麦蚜亚群落主要特征值分析表明,多样性指数和均匀度为:麦套荷兰豆>单作麦田>麦套油菜,优势度和优势集中性指数为:麦套油菜>单作麦田>麦套荷兰豆;主要捕食性天敌亚群落的多样性指数和均匀度为:单作麦田>麦套油菜>麦套荷兰豆,优势度和优势集中性指数为:麦套荷兰豆田>麦套油菜田>单作麦田。Based on the dynamic analysis of community structure characteristics, the effects of different intercropping models on wheat aphids and their predators were studied in this paper. Three intercropping models were used: Model Ⅰ : wheat intercropping tonka-beans; Model Ⅱ: wheat intercropping cole; Model Ⅲ: monocuhure of wheat. The results showed that the richness of predators and the stability of insect communities ranked as follows : Model Ⅰ 〉 Model Ⅱ 〉 Model m. The most stability of wheat aphid sub-communities and predator sub-communities were detected in wheat intercropping tonkabeans field and in monocuhure wheat field, respectively. The other characteristics of wheat aphid sub-communities ranked as follows : Model Ⅰ 〉 Model Ⅲ 〉 Model Ⅱ for Diversity index and evenness, and Model Ⅱ 〉 Model m 〉 Model Ⅰ for Dominance and Dominant concentrations. For predator sub-communities, Model Ⅲ 〉 Model Ⅱ〉 Model I for diversity indexes and evenness, and Model 〉 Model Ⅱ 〉 Model m for dominance and dominant concentrations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171