检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴家旺[1] 朱小梅[1] 王正银[1] 董燕[1] 朱洪霞[1]
出 处:《水土保持学报》2007年第1期188-192,共5页Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
基 金:国家"863"计划(2001AA246022和2004AA246020)资助项目
摘 要:采用盆栽试验研究了缓释复合肥对强酸性土、酸性土、中性土上红三叶产量和品质的效应。结果表明,与等养分普通复合肥相比,不同土壤施用缓释复合肥可显著提高红三叶产量,增产率以强酸性土(55.8%)〉中性土(39.9%)〉酸性土(7.4%);不同缓释复合肥在不同土壤上的肥效有差异,强酸性土和酸性土上施用低磷钾的缓释复合肥产量高,中性土则以施高磷钾缓释复合肥者产量高。缓释复合肥能改善3种土壤第一茬、第二茬红三叶饲用品质和矿质品质,其中粗蛋白提高4.0%-23.1%,粗脂肪提高2.5%-38.6%,粗灰分提高1.4%-23.6%,粗纤维降低2.5%-23.3%,磷提高4.9%-18.6%,钙提高1.8%-13.7%。红三叶异黄酮含量受土壤影响较大,强酸性土和酸性土上缓释复合肥处理的异黄酮含量低于等养分普通复合肥,而中性土施用缓释复合肥提高了红三叶异黄酮含量。A pot experiment was carried out to study the effect of slow-release fertilizers(SRF) on yield and quality of Trifolium pretense in strong acidic soil, acidic soil and neutral soil. As comparison to common compound fertilization(CCF), the results indicated that the yield of Trifolium pretense was increased significantly for the application of SRF in different soils, and in terms of the increase degree, the sequence of the soil was strong acidic soil (55.8%)〉 neutral soil(39.9%)〉 acidic soil(7.4%). The yield was differ from application of different SRF in different soil. The best yield was appeared for the application of SRF2 in strong acidic soil and acidic soil, while in neutral soil the highest yield was obtained for the application of SRF2. The forge nutritive quality and mineral quality was enhanced for the application of SRF in the first and second batch of Trifolium pretense. The crude protein(CP) was increased from 4.0% -23.1%, the ether extract (EE) was increased from 2.5 % - 38.6 %, the crude ash(CA) was enhanced from 1.4%-23.6%, the acid detergent fiber(ADF) was decreased from 2.5%- 23.3%, the element phosphorus was increased from 4.9%- 18.6%, and calcium was increased from 1.8%- 13.7%. The content of isoflavonoids in Trifolium pretense was strongly affected by different soils, in strong acidic soil and acidic soil the content of isoflavonoids was lower in treatments SRF than in treatment CCF, while in neutral soil the content of isoflavonoids in Trifolium pretense were all enhanced in different treatments.
分 类 号:S143.6[农业科学—肥料学] S541.2[农业科学—农业基础科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222