论知识产权侵权的归责原则  

On the Criterion of Liability of Intellectual Property Infringement

作　　者：费艳颖[1] 杨超[2] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026 [2]大连理工大学人文社会科学学院,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《辽宁师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第2期22-25,共4页Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：辽宁省中青年哲学社会科学人才基金资助项目

摘　　要：知识产权侵权的归责原则是知识产权侵权领域的一个核心问题。然而,目前我国立法对这一问题却没有做出明确规定。在通说认为应适用过错责任原则的同时,也有学者认为应适用无过错责任和过错推定责任原则。这里在介绍和评析侵权行为的传统归责原则的基础上,比较一般侵权和知识产权侵权的异同,特别是两种侵权行为所侵害的客体,即一般侵权行为的客体和知识产权的区别,明确知识产权自身的特性。同时,借鉴TRIPs协议的规定和其他国家知识产权侵权的相关立法,对完善我国知识产权侵权的归责原则提出建议。The criterion of liability is one of the most important problems in the field of the intellectual property infringement, while laws in China do not have relevant regulations to it. It is generally believed that principle of fault liability is to be applied; however, there are also some authors who hold the opinion that principle of no fault liability and fault assumption liability should be suitable. Based on the introduction and comment of the traditional criterion of liability of infringement, this thesis compares the differences between the common infringement and intellectual property infringement, especially the differences be- tween the subjects of the two infringements, property and intellectual property, identifies the characteristics of intellectual property, and also makes some comparison among the TRIPs and foreign legislations on this issue, advancing some suggestions to perfect the criterion of liability in the intellectual property infringements.

关 键 词：知识产权侵权 过错责任 无过错责任 归责原则 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]