检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]辽宁工程技术大学资源与环境工程学院,辽宁阜新123000
出 处:《湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版)》2007年第1期89-91,95,共4页Journal of Hunan University of Arts and Science(Science and Technology)
摘 要:水平管道粗颗粒浆体阻力损失的研究在矿业工程方面很有实际意义,而目前这方面的计算模型大多还不完善.为了选择合适的摩阻损失计算模型,基于前人的实验数据,采用同类比较法对目前三家具有代表性的粗颗粒浆体管道摩阻损失计算模型进行了探讨,发现三家公式都存在随着固体颗粒粒径和浓度的增加,误差都有增大的趋势.Newitt的缺点在于缺少浓度考量;Durand公式误差来源于重力理论的不足,许振良公式的不足在于相关参数取值.It is significative in mining Engineering to investigate the friction loss of coarse particle slurry in horizontal pipeline, but the research on this respect is not perfect. In order to pick out appropriate calculation model for friction loss, based on the experimental results of involved expert in this aspect, congener comparative method is used to discuss three calculation model for coarse particle slurry. And it turned that the extent of error between three model and experimental results increases as particle diameter and concentration add. The deficiency of Newitt model is lack of concentration, and the error of Durand model lies in gravity theory's deficiency, and the deficiency of Xu zhen-liang model lies in correlative parameters' value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15