检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学教育学院公体部,浙江杭州310028 [2]浙江大学教育学院体育系,浙江杭州310028
出 处:《北京体育大学学报》2007年第2期234-236,共3页Journal of Beijing Sport University
基 金:浙江省教育厅课题;课题号(204000-F30406)
摘 要:随着体育课程改革的深入,以运动技能为主要考核内容的学习评价方法仍然没有发生根本的变化,这与2002版《纲要》精神严重不符。基于此,以田麦久“项群训练理论”分类为依据,从运动知识技能的理解与掌握、运动参与、进步幅度、情感与行为态度四个方面制定可操作的评价方法和标准,构思了表现性项目评价、对抗性项目评价、体能类项目评价三类将学习目标具体化后可具体操作的适合不同体育项目、不同课的类型的评价体系。With the further development of P.E. curriculum reform, the assessment method based on the main examining contents of motor skills has not yet changed much. This does not accord with 2002 Outlines. According to Tian Maijiu's Groups of Training Theory, four respects are selected as the appraisal contents, including the understanding and mastering motor skills and knowledge, movement participation, progressive range, and emotion and behavior attitude. The assessment system that can be operated is put forward to fit with different sports events and different types of classes. This assessment system includes expressive events assessment, antagonistic events assessment, and physical power type of events assessment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28