检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张明喜[1]
机构地区:[1]上海财经大学公共经济与管理学院,上海200439
出 处:《税务与经济》2007年第2期19-23,共5页Taxation and Economy
基 金:2005年度教育部人文社会科学研究项目<地方财政支出结构优化研究>的资助(课题主持人:陈志勇教授)
摘 要:地方财政支出是政府统筹区域经济协调发展的重要手段。根据近十年来我国区域经济增长的敛散性以及我国地方财政支出对区域经济差距影响的实证检验,结果表明:经济增长的收敛模式在全国范围内没有绝对收敛,也没有条件收敛,三大地区中只有东部地区存在“俱乐部收敛”现象;地方财政支出总体上没有达到缩小地区经济差距的效果,突出表现在中部地区;地方科教文卫支出和社会保障支出比重的提升有利于缩小区域经济差距,而地方行政管理费用的扩张则扩大了区域经济差距。Fiscal expenditure is an important means for government to harmonize of regional economic development. This paper measures and analyzes regional economic growth in the convergence test for past ten years. It also analyzes local fiscal expenditure's influence on regional economic disparity. Conclusions are as follows: Convergence mode of economic growth in the countrywide is not absolute convergence and conditional convergence. There is club convergence only in the East region among the three major regions. Local expenditure did not meet the overall effect of reducing regional economical disparities, especially in the Central region. Raising the proportion of science, education, culture & public health expenditure and social security expenditure is conducive to regional economic convergence. However, local administrative costs expand the regional economical disparity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227