非经刑事定罪的没收制度与我国相关法律完善  

Probe on forfeiture without sentence system

作　　者：王秋玲[1] 苗春[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学法学院,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《大连海事大学学报（社会科学版）》2007年第1期39-42,共4页Journal of Dalian Maritime University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：辽宁省社科联基金项目(2006INSKIKTFX-38-30)

摘　　要：在简单介绍《联合国反腐败公约》关于非经刑事定罪而没收犯罪财产制度的基础上,通过对民事没收和缺席审判在未经刑事定罪情况下实现对财产没收进行比较分析,得出缺席审判更适合中国国情的结论,并对缺席审判制度的进一步完善提出建议。The article introduces the forfeiture without sentence which is proposed by United Nations Convention against Corruption, and compares the forfeiture without sentence through civil forfeiture and the judgment of default, then concludes that the later adapt to china. The article gives some advices to build the system of the default judgment.

关 键 词：《联合国反腐败公约》 未经刑事定罪的没收制度 民事没收 缺席审判 

分 类 号：DF01[政治法律—法学理论]