检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学,湖北武汉430060 [2]对外经济贸易大学,北京100029
出 处:《保险研究》2007年第3期86-89,共4页Insurance Studies
摘 要:当受益人与被保险人在同一事故中死亡时,死亡的先后顺序对保险受益权的确定具有决定性的作用。若受益人与被保险人在同一事件中死亡而不能确定死亡先后顺序时,不应简单适用我国现行继承法上的共同死亡推定规则。我国现行《保险法》对此并没有明文规定。本文针对此问题,通过具体分析受益人与被保险人的法律地位及其权利和受益权与继承权之间的关系,讨论受益人与被保险人在同一事件中死亡而不能确定先后时的死亡推定规则及其法律精神。When the insured and the beneficiary die in the same accident, the order of their death is definitive of the beneficiary right. In case that their order of death cannot be ascertained, we cannot simply apply the putative rule of mutual death in the current Inheritance Law of China. The current "Insurance Law of China" doesn' t prescribe on this situation. This paper discusses the putative rule and legal spirit of death of the insured and the beneficiary when their order of death in the same accident cannot be ascertained by analyzing in great depth the legal status and rights of the beneficiary and the insured and the relationship between the beneficiary right and the inheritance right.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3