检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁学红
出 处:《云南大学学报(法学版)》2007年第1期104-107,共4页Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition
摘 要:最高人民法院公布的《关于审理存单纠纷案件的若干规定》司法解释施行八年来,全国法院依据该司法解释审结了大量的存单纠纷案件,取得了丰硕的成果,但是在适用该司法解释时各地法院的认识却不尽相同,特别是在存款的所有权归属、存单的法律特征、以存单为表现形式的借贷纠纷案件的认定、公款私存问题等方面的认识仍存在分歧,本文将对上述问题进行分析。The Supreme People's Court announces " about Trying Deposit receipt Dispute Case Certain Stipulations" the judicial interpretation executes for eight years, the national court rested on this judicial interpretation to set-de the massive deposit receipt dispute case, has yielded the substantial result, but when was suitable this judicial interpretation each place court understanding is different actually, specially in the deposit property rights ownership, the deposit receipt legal characteristic, lent money the dispute case take the deposit receipt as the manifestation to recognize, the government money private saved aspect and so on question understanding still to have the difference, this article carries on the brief analysis to the above question.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.220.98.157