检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院公共卫生系 [2]杭州市疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《浙江预防医学》2007年第4期15-16,共2页Zhejiang Journal of Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的探索疾病预防控制(CDC)机构综合效益评价的方法,为各疾控机构之间的横向比较和机构自身之间的纵向比较提供量化依据。方法选择经Delphi法、变异系数法和聚类分析法等3种方法筛选后的17个指标做为评价指标,应用TOPSIS法对杭州地区13家疾控机构2004年各自的综合效益进行评价,并进行质量优劣的评定。结果CDC 2的综合效益值位居第一,而CDC 6则位居末位,这与实际情况相符。结论Topsis法是一种较为准确、实用的综合评价方法。Objective To explore the methods for evaluation of comprehensive effects of centers for disease control and prevention (CDCs), and provide quantitative foundation for horizontal comparison among CDCs and horizontal comparison among each CDC itself. Methods 17 indicators were chose as evaluation index by using methods of Delphi, coefficient of variation and cluster analysis. TOPSIS was applied on the evaluation of comprehensive effects of 13 CDCs in Hangzhou in 2004. Results the value of comprehensive effects in CDC 2 listed on the top while that of CDC 6 listed last, which was consistent with the fact. Conclusions TOPSIS is a relative accurate and practical method for comprehensive evaluation.
分 类 号:R197.2[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15