检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈丽芬[1] 林翠梧[1] 韦藤幼[1] 韦万兴[1] 陈海燕[1]
出 处:《精细化工》2007年第4期355-358,共4页Fine Chemicals
基 金:广西科技攻关项目(桂科攻0480005);广西大学科学技术研究重点基金资助项目(2003ZD05)
摘 要:用传统索氏提取法及现代提取方法——微波萃取法、超声波萃取法、内部汽化法4种不同的提取方法对战骨中的总黄酮进行了提取工艺研究。采用上述4种方法对战骨中总黄酮进行提取,并进行了后3种方法的L9(34)正交设计性实验。测定了以上4种方法的战骨提取液的总黄酮含量及回收率,并将后3种方法与索氏提取法进行比较。结果表明,微波萃取法、超声波萃取法、内部汽化法的最优方案的收率分别为2.07%,1.90%,1.78%,平均回收率分别为100.60%,105.12%,99.92%,相对标准偏差分别为1.40%,1.47%,1.16%。索氏提取法提取的收率为0.95%。现代方法的收率均高于传统索氏提取法。The conventional Soxhlet extraction and modem methods such as microwave extraction ( ME ), ultrasonic extraction (UE) and inner evaporation extraction ( IEE ) were studied for the optimal extraction of total flavonoids in Premna fulva craib. The four methods were compared by their results of content of total flavonoids and recoveries. The extraction yields of the optimum process by ME,UE and IEE were 2.07% , 1.90% and 1.78% respectively, the average recoveries were 100. 60% , 105.12% and 99.92% ,and the RSD were 1.40% , 1.47% and 1.16% ,respectively. The yields of three modem methods are better than that of Soxhlet extraction(0. 95 % ).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.197.164