检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜修力[1] 王智慧[1] 李立云[1] 姜丽萍[1] 侯世伟[1]
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学城市与工程安全减灾省部共建教育部重点实验室,北京100022
出 处:《岩土工程学报》2007年第4期598-602,共5页Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
基 金:国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(50325826);北京市教育委员会科学技术与研究生教育建设资助项目(4700001401509)
摘 要:针对基坑开挖的土钉支护问题,提出将经验遗传–单纯形算法应用于支护结构的稳定性验算,并与一般遗传算法的结果进行了比较。比较结果表明:本文建议的方法更有效和准确。文中还对一个具体的工程实例使用本文建议的方法进行了验算分析,并与商业软件的分析结果做了比较。结果表明:该商业软件未能搜索到最危险滑裂面,其结果对稳定性评价是偏于不安全的。此外,在土钉支护的稳定性验算过程中,一些优化程序在求解安全系数时将土层看作或是转化为均质土,而本文方法考虑了土体的分层。Based on empirical genetic-simplex algorithm (EGSA), an analytical method of the interior stability of soil-nailed structure for deep foundation pits was proposed. Compared with genetic algorithm (GA), it was shown that EGSA was better than GA. The calculation of the integral stability of a practical engineering example was carded out by using the proposed method and commercial software respectively. It was shown that the most dangerous sliding-plane could not be found out and its evaluation on stability was unsafe by using the commercial software. Furthermore, during calculating the interior stability of soil-nailed structure, the soil deposit was commonly regarded as homogeneous. In this paper, the stratified character of soil deposit was considered.
关 键 词:经验遗传-单纯形算法 基坑 土钉结构 稳定验算
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42