检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张小刚[1] 王学志[2] 宋玉普[3] 李顺群[2] 黄志强[3]
机构地区:[1]深圳大学土木工程学院,深圳518060 [2]辽宁工学院土木建筑系,锦州121001 [3]大连理工大学土木水利学院,大连116024
出 处:《武汉理工大学学报》2007年第4期91-94,共4页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(50179002);辽宁省教育厅科学研究计划(2004F105)
摘 要:通过用不同工况的碾压混凝土试件近似模拟碾压混凝土初凝前层面、中间型层面和终凝后层面及本体形式并进行I型断裂试验。通过对试验结果进行分析,总结了各种层面形式的断裂韧度的规律,比较了层面处理方式和间隔时间对于层面断裂性能的影响。同时进行了层面劈拉试验,并比较了层面I型断裂特性与抗拉强度特性之间的规律。得到了本体试件的失稳韧度最大,终凝后层面形式的次之,中间型层面形式的更小一些,初凝前层面形式的最小及层面相对于本体的断裂破坏比强度破坏更为脆弱的结论。Many engineering situations were adopted to simulate layer surface before initial setting time, middle layer surface, layer surface after final setting time and body formations and mode I fracture experiment were performed. The variation of fracture toughness of all kinds of layer surface was summarized on the analysis of tests results. The effect of treatment and interval time of the RCC layer surface on fracture properties of that were compared. At the same time, splitting tensile experiment of layer surfaces was performed, and variation of characteristics of mode I fracture and tensile strength was compared. Some conclusions were drawn that unstable fracture toughness of body specimen was the largest, which of layer surface after final setting time was a little smaller than that of body specimen, which of layer surface before initial setting time smaller than that of layer surface after final setting time, which of middle layer surface was the smallest and fracture failure of layer surfaces to body was weaker than strength failure of layer surfaces to body.
分 类 号:TV313[水利工程—水工结构工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.9.170