检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何纬[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北省江汉油田总医院妇产科,湖北潜江433124
出 处:《医学信息(西安上半月)》2007年第4期625-626,共2页Medical Information
摘 要:目的探讨硬膜外镇痛分娩过程的护理。方法对本科2004年12月-2006年12月住院分娩产妇按自愿接受无痛分娩的要求分成无痛分娩组52人(实验组)和传统自然分娩组55人(对照组),对疼痛程度、产程、产后出血、新生儿情况等进行比较分析。结果实验组与对照组比较镇痛效果有显著差异(P<0.01),产程明显缩短(P<0.05),而产后出血,新生儿情况两组无差异。结论硬膜外镇痛分娩阵痛效果好,促进产程进展,对产后出血及新生儿均无不良影响。Objective To study the nurse of the epidural anesthesia for pain relief (EAPE) delivery process.Methods 52 volunteers received EAPE (test group)and 55 ones received traditional delivery (cantrol group)were chosen for deliveny in our hospital from December 2004 to December 2006,and compared in the pain degree,the length of delivery process.the bleeding after delivery,the condition of babies,et al. Results There were significant difference between the two groups in the pain degree,(P〈0.01),and in the length of delivery process (P〈0.05).There were no significant difference between the two groups in the bleeding after delivery and the condition of babies.Conclusion The effect of pain relief during epidural anesthesia was good.The delivery process was progressed and there were no bad effect for the bleeding after delivery and infants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.185.110